Market Timing Debunked Again

head transAs the market roars ahead 6% for the year and much of the country shivers under an Arctic Blast in the middle of Winter, I am reminded of why God created stock analysts: to make the weather forecasters look good.  The idea of tactical asset allocation and market timing in both index annuities and variable annuities is provocative and interesting. Jackson National recently launched it’s Elite Access Variable Annuity product and Franklin- Templeton mutual funds has been pushing the envelope with it’s emphasis Globally in Frontier markets. Commander Kirk of the Starship Enterprise would be blushing by now in  conveying to Scotty that we have been here before. These products certainly fill a void but typically hit the street about five years too late for savers as product wonks conjure up ideas with a rear view mirror.


The Jackson VA product features a broad investment lineup moniker including access to alternative investments like managed futures and covered calls.  “the product claims to take advantage of incredible growth and unthinkable volatility” much like the triple levered ETFS advertised just prior to the tech wreck of 2000-2003.  Meanwhile the traditional 60-40 stock bond allocators laugh all the way to the bank as a measurement of the market’s volatility, the VIX, remains tranquil and stays below 20 consistently as the stock market climbs a wall of worries pushing pas 1500 on the S&P 500. The wonks at Jackson and Security Benefit may be right in the long haul but after successful policy launches, one wonders if the annuity  policyholders will benefit from another tactical asset allocation stumble.


Reincarnations of market timing are often given new names. In 1988 after an October crash, tactical asset allocation was all the rage as proponents argued that computers would minimize the risk of human judgments. Today, variable annuity companies justify forced allocations into bonds at the end of a 30 year bull market for bonds and with record low yields to justify providing a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits.(GWLB).  Advisers who rely entirely on the asset allocation models and forced VA allocations and not on subjective judgment and conviction may be setting their clients up for the same disappointments that occurred in 1988. A 1974 study by award winning professor William Sharpe showed clearly that being invested in Bull Markets is much more important than being out of stocks in a Bear Market even after periods like the last 12 years. The study showed despite what life insurers do to provide pricing for an income rider which is switching money in and out of the market requires a forecasting success that is impossible because major turning points in the stock market are almost always triggered by random events that are completely unpredictable. The “surprise “ burst through  the 1500 level for the S&P 500 has been missed by many Variable Annuity allocations that provide living benefit riders and missed  the 2012-13 move of nearly 20% in the markets.  This is one reason why most VA subaccount lineups underperform along with high fee level. One advantage of Jackson’s new product, like its predecessor products as well, is it does not force investors and advisers into a model. Maybe this is why Jackson is consistently a top give VA vendor and has a majority of its subaccounts outperforming benchmark indices most of the time.

Ralph McQuarrie's Redesigned Enterprise

Ralph McQuarrie’s Redesigned Enterprise (Photo credit: Wikipedia)




Enhanced by Zemanta
space Please show your support for this article by clicking on the social media icons on this page!
The articles displayed in are for educational purposes only. This website of course does not know you, so do not rely on it for making final decisions for your insurance, investment, or tax needs. Always be sure to seek out personalized guidance from a licensed advisor/agent in your state for your insurance, investment, or tax planning needs.

Tags: , , , , ,

One comment

  • Hello, guest
  • A good wealth advisor, financial planner should demand that his/her clients meet often to discuss their holdings. This requires some commitment on the part of the client as well as the advisor. Understanding today's complicated options for guaranteed income cannot be accomplished in one or two hourly meetings. Advisors owe it to their clients to make a lifelong commitment to continuing education, Then we may truly say we are putting the needs of the client first. I accomplish this through a Client Advisory Board.